Yes, I know about that other Darwin, too. So they've found a new hominid skull that is the oldest yet found. It somewhat destroys the current assumptions about the human evolutionary timeline (or at least some scientists say it does). How soon will the anti-Darwinists grab hold of this as "proof" that the theory of evolution is incorrect?

Suprise, folks. Science encourages new evidence. That's how it works. This skull doesn't "destroy" anything. It merely forces us to examine new possibilities. That's what it's all about...

I'm not anti-science at all! But I am anti-what-most-people-think-of-as-science... an immutable set of laws... because as most scientists know, that's not the case. And if there ever is evidence against the theory of natural selection and for "intelligent design," I'll be the first one to demand that it be investigated, even though it goes against every fiber of my being.

This has been brought to you by the Department of Incoherent Rhetoric.